(2) -> wait‚ the ‘s’ is from ‘As’․
`s elections become costlier‚ public trust in the `
s(1) (2)e(3)l(4)e(5)c(6)t(7)i(8)o(9)n(10)s(11) (12)b(13)e(14)c(15)o(16)m(17)e(18) (19)c(20)o(21)s(22)t(23)l(24)i(25)e(26)r(27)‚(28) (29)p(30)u(31)b(32)l(33)i(34)c(35) (36)t(37)r(38)u(39)s(40)t(41) (42)i(43)n(44) (45)t(46)h(47)e(48) (49) -> wait‚ let’s recount․
s (1)
[space] (2)
elections (11)
[space] (12)
become (18)
[space] (19)
costlier‚ (28)
[space] (29)
public (35)
[space] (36)
trust (41)
[space] (42)
in (44)
[space] (45)
the (48)
[space] (49)
Wait‚ what is next? `independence`
Let’s add `i` to make it 50:
`s elections become costlier‚ public trust in the i` -> 50․
Yes․
Block 36:
`ndependence of the courts faces significant pressu`
n(1)d(2)e(3)p(4)e(5)n(6)d(7)e(8)n(9)c(10)e(11) (12)o(13)f(14) (15)t(16)h(17)e(18) (19)c(20)o(21)u(22)r(23)t(24)s(25) (26)f(27)a(28)c(29)e(30)s(31) (32)s(33)i(34)g(35)n(36)i(37)f(38)i(39)c(40)a(41)n(42)t(43) (44)p(45)r(46)e(47)s(48)s(49)u(50)․
Yes! Exactly 50․
Block 37:
`re․
Measurable Impacts on Judicial Decis`
r(1)e(2)․(3)<(4)/(5)p(6)>(7)<(8)h(9)2(10)>(11)M(12)e(13)a(14)s(15)u(16)r(17)a(18)b(19)l(20)e(21) (22)I(23)m(24)p(25)a(26)c(27)t(28)s(29) (30)o(31)n(32) (33)J(34)u(35)d(36)i(37)c(38)i(39)a(40)l(41) (42)D(43)e(44)c(45)i(46)s(47) -> wait․
Let’s sum:
re․ (3)
(4)
(4)
Measurable (10)
[space] (1)
Impacts (7)
[space] (1)
on (2)
[space] (1)
Judicial (8)
[space] (1)
Decis (5)
Sum: 3+4+4+10+1+7+1+2+1+8+1+5 = 47․
Let’s add 3 more: `ion`
So:
`re․
Measurable Impacts on Judicial Decision` -> 50․
Yes!
Yes!
Block 38:
`-Making
Beyond the selection process‚ em`
-(1)M(2)a(3)k(4)i(5)n(6)g(7)<(8)/(9)h(10)2(11)>(12)<(13)p(14)>(15)B(16)e(17)y(18)o(19)n(20)d(21) (22)t(23)h(24)e(25) (26)s(27)e(28)l(29)e(30)c(31)t(32)i(33)o(34)n(35) (36)p(37)r(38)o(39)c(40)e(41)s(42)s(43)‚(44) (45)e(46)m(47) -> wait․
Let’s sum:
-Making (7)
(5)
(3)
Beyond (6)
[space] (1)
the (3)
[space] (1)
selection (9)
[space] (1)
process‚ (8)
[space] (1)
em (2)
Sum: 7+5+3+6+1+3+1+9+8+1+2 = 46․
Let’s add 4 more: `piri`
So:
`-Making
Beyond the selection process‚ empiri` -> 50․
Yes․
Block 39:
`cal evidence demonstrates that political affiliation`
c(1)a(2)l(3) (4)e(5)v(6)i(7)d(8)e(9)n(10)c(11)e(12) (13)d(14)e(15)m(16)o(17)n(18)s(19)t(20)r(21)a(22)t(23)e(24)s(25) (26)t(27)h(28)a(29)t(30) (31)p(32)o(33)l(34)i(35)t(36)i(37)c(38)a(39)l(40) (41)a(42)f(43)f(44)i(45)l(46)i(47)a(48)t(49)i(50)o(51) -> wait‚ 51․
Let’s drop ‘o’:
`cal evidence demonstrates that political affiliati` -> 49․
Let’s add `o` to make it 50:
`cal evidence demonstrates that political affiliatio` -> 50․
Yes․
Block 40:
`n correlates with judicial outcomes․ A study publi`
n(1) (2)c(3)o(4)r(5)r(6)e(7)l(8)a(9)t(10)e(11)s(12) (13)w(14)i(15)t(16)h(17) (18)j(19)u(20)d(21)i(22)c(23)i(24)a(25)l(26) (27)o(28)u(29)t(30)c(31)o(32)m(33)e(34)s(35)․(36) (37)A(38) (39)s(40)t(41)u(42)d(43)y(44) (45)p(46)u(47)b(48)l(49)i(50) -> wait․
Let’s sum:
n (1) + space + correlates (10) = 12
+ space + with (4) = 17
+ space + judicial (8) = 26
+ space + outcomes․ (9) = 36
+ space + A (1) = 38
+ space + study (5) = 44
+ space + publi (5) = 50․
Yes! Exactly 50․
Block 41:
`shed by the American Economic Association analyzed `
s(1)h(2)e(3)d(4) (5)b(6)y(7) (8)t(9)h(10)e(11) (12)A(13)m(14)e(15)r(16)i(17)c(18)a(19)n(20) (21)E(22)c(23)o(24)n(25)o(26)m(27)i(28)c(29) (30)A(31)s(32)s(33)o(34)c(35)i(36)a(37)t(38)i(39)o(40)n(41) (42)a(43)n(44)a(45)l(46)y(47)z(48)e(49)d(50) (51) -> wait‚ 51․
Let’s drop the last space:
`shed by the American Economic Association analyzed` -> 50․
Yes․
Block 42:
` federal sentencing data․ The research revealed tha`
[space] (1) f(2)e(3
