As of October 21, 2025, at 14:18:42, the question of whether churches can contribute to political campaigns remains a complex one, governed primarily by the Johnson Amendment and IRS regulations.
Table of contents
The Johnson Amendment
The Johnson Amendment, introduced in 1954 by then-Senator Lyndon B. Johnson, is a provision in the Internal Revenue Code’s section 501(c)(3). It states that any charity, including churches, seeking tax-exempt status is absolutely prohibited from participating in or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for elective public office.
IRS Regulations and Interpretations
The IRS interprets and enforces the Johnson Amendment. Churches risk losing their 501(c)(3) status if they violate this prohibition. While a complete ban was previously enforced, the IRS has recently signaled a shift, potentially allowing churches greater leeway in speaking about political campaigns and candidates without automatically losing their tax-exempt status.
Permissible Activities
Despite the restrictions, churches can engage in certain activities:
- Speaking about political issues (but not candidates)
- Conducting voter registration drives (with limitations)
- Educating members on public policy issues
Prohibited Activities
Federal law specifically prohibits churches from:
- Making financial contributions to a candidate or political campaign.
- Organizing or making contributions to political action committees (PACs).
- Expressly advocating for or against a candidate.
Recent Developments and Uncertainty
A recent IRS settlement suggests a potential easing of restrictions, granting churches more freedom to discuss political candidates. However, this development also introduces uncertainty and raises questions about the boundaries between permissible speech and prohibited political intervention. The interplay between free speech, religious liberty, and tax-exempt status continues to be a subject of legal and public debate.
Churches are still fundamentally restricted from directly contributing to political campaigns. However, recent developments indicate a possible shift towards greater freedom of speech on political matters. Churches must exercise caution and seek legal counsel to navigate these evolving regulations and avoid jeopardizing their tax-exempt status.
The implications of any increased political activity by churches are significant. Supporters argue it allows religious institutions to more effectively advocate for their values and beliefs in the public square. Critics fear it could further politicize religious institutions, potentially alienating members and blurring the lines between church and state.
Arguments for Greater Political Involvement
- Freedom of Speech: Proponents argue that restricting churches’ political speech infringes upon their First Amendment rights.
- Moral Voice: They believe that churches have a moral obligation to speak out on important social and political issues.
- Community Representation: Churches often serve as important community hubs and can effectively represent the views of their congregations.
Arguments Against Political Involvement
- Loss of Tax-Exempt Status: Engaging in partisan politics could jeopardize churches’ tax-exempt status, potentially impacting their financial stability.
- Divisiveness: Political endorsements can create divisions within congregations and damage the church’s reputation.
- Erosion of Neutrality: Active involvement in political campaigns can compromise the church’s perceived neutrality and objectivity.
Navigating the Legal Landscape
Churches that choose to engage in political activities must carefully navigate the complex legal landscape. They should:
- Consult with Legal Counsel: Seek expert legal advice to ensure compliance with IRS regulations and relevant campaign finance laws.
- Maintain Transparency: Clearly disclose any political activities to their members and the public.
- Avoid Explicit Endorsements: Refrain from explicitly endorsing or opposing candidates in official church publications or services.
- Focus on Issues: Emphasize policy issues rather than individual candidates.
The Future of Church and Politics
The relationship between churches and politics is likely to remain a subject of ongoing debate and legal scrutiny. The interpretation and enforcement of the Johnson Amendment will continue to shape the boundaries of permissible political activity by religious institutions. The key for churches is to understand the current regulations, seek professional guidance, and carefully consider the potential consequences of their actions.
Ultimately, the decision of whether and how to engage in political activities rests with each individual church, weighing its religious beliefs, community values, and legal obligations.
